On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:46 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@suse.cz>
> 
> Drop the initial reference by fsnotify_init_mark early instead of
> audit_tree_freeing_mark() at destroy time.
> 
> In the cases we destroy the mark before we drop the initial reference we need 
> to
> get rid of the get_mark that balances the put_mark in 
> audit_tree_freeing_mark().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszer...@suse.cz>

I don't love this.  The reference from fsnotify_init_mark() should live
until fsnotify_mark_destroy().  If we need to drop a reference in
audit_tree_freeing_mark() we should be taking that elsewhere....

> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c |   12 +++++++++---
>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index 31fdc48..7b95706 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>       spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>       spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
>       fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry);
> +     fsnotify_put_mark(&new->mark);  /* drop initial reference */
>       goto out;
>  
>  Fallback:
> @@ -330,7 +331,6 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct 
> audit_tree *tree)
>               spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>               chunk->dead = 1;
>               spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> -             fsnotify_get_mark(entry);
>               fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry);
>               fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
>               return 0;
> @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct 
> audit_tree *tree)
>       insert_hash(chunk);
>       spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>       spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> +     fsnotify_put_mark(entry);       /* drop initial reference */
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -411,7 +412,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct 
> audit_tree *tree)
>               spin_unlock(&chunk_entry->lock);
>               spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
>  
> -             fsnotify_get_mark(chunk_entry);
>               fsnotify_destroy_mark(chunk_entry);
>  
>               fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry);
> @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct 
> audit_tree *tree)
>       spin_unlock(&chunk_entry->lock);
>       spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
>       fsnotify_destroy_mark(old_entry);
> +     fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry); /* drop initial reference */
>       fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry); /* pair to fsnotify_find mark_entry */
>       return 0;
>  }
> @@ -915,7 +916,12 @@ static void audit_tree_freeing_mark(struct fsnotify_mark 
> *entry, struct fsnotify
>       struct audit_chunk *chunk = container_of(entry, struct audit_chunk, 
> mark);
>  
>       evict_chunk(chunk);
> -     fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * We are guaranteed to have at least one reference to the mark from
> +      * either the inode or the caller of fsnotify_destroy_mark().
> +      */
> +     BUG_ON(atomic_read(&entry->refcnt) < 1);
>  }
>  
>  static bool audit_tree_send_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct inode 
> *inode,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to