On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 19:46 +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
> 
> Refcounting of fsnotify_mark in audit tree is broken.  E.g:
> 
>                               refcount
> create_chunk
>   alloc_chunk                 1
>   fsnotify_add_mark           2
> 
> untag_chunk
>   fsnotify_get_mark           3
>   fsnotify_destroy_mark
>     audit_tree_freeing_mark   2
>   fsnotify_put_mark           1
>   fsnotify_put_mark           0
>   via destroy_list
>     fsnotify_mark_destroy    -1
> 
> This was reported by various people as triggering Oops when stopping auditd.
> 
> We could just remove the put_mark from audit_tree_freeing_mark() but that 
> would
> break freeing via inode destruction.  So this patch simply omits a put_mark
> after calling destroy_mark (or adds a get_mark before).
> 
> Next patch will clean up the remaining mess.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
> CC: [email protected]

Agreed this is needed.  My changelog was:

    audit: fix ref count problems in audit trees
    
    Before the switch from in kernel inotify to fsnotify for audit trees the
    code regularly did:
        inotify_evict_watch(&chunk->watch);
        put_inotify_watch(&chunk->watch);
    
    I translated this in fsnotify_speak into:
        fsnotify_destroy_mark_by_entry(chunk_entry);
        fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry);
    
    The problem is that the inotify_evict_watch function actually took a
    reference on chunk->watch, which is what was being dropped by
    put_inotify_watch().  The fsnotify code does not take such a reference
    during fsnotify_destroy_mark_by_entry().  Thus we are dropping reference
    counts prematurely and eventually we hit a use after free!  Whoops!
    
    Fix these call sites to not drop the extra reference.
    
    Reported-by: Valentin Avram <[email protected]>
    Reported-by: Peter Moody <[email protected]>
    Partial-patch-by: Marcelo Cerri <[email protected]>
    Signed-off-by: Eric Paris <[email protected]>

Maybe you can use some of that changelog in your next post?  (If you do
one?)  The only reason you would repost is because I don't understand
why you took a ref in some places instead of just not dropping it
everywhere...

> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c |    5 ++---
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index d52d247..31fdc48 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,6 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>               spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>               spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
>               fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry);
> -             fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> @@ -293,7 +292,6 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>       spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>       spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
>       fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry);
> -     fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
>       goto out;
>  
>  Fallback:
> @@ -332,6 +330,7 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct 
> audit_tree *tree)
>               spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>               chunk->dead = 1;
>               spin_unlock(&entry->lock);
> +             fsnotify_get_mark(entry);
>               fsnotify_destroy_mark(entry);
>               fsnotify_put_mark(entry);
>               return 0;

Like here?  Why not just avoid the atomic op altogether?

> @@ -412,6 +411,7 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct 
> audit_tree *tree)
>               spin_unlock(&chunk_entry->lock);
>               spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
>  
> +             fsnotify_get_mark(chunk_entry);
>               fsnotify_destroy_mark(chunk_entry);
>  
>               fsnotify_put_mark(chunk_entry);
> @@ -445,7 +445,6 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct 
> audit_tree *tree)
>       spin_unlock(&old_entry->lock);
>       fsnotify_destroy_mark(old_entry);
>       fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry); /* pair to fsnotify_find mark_entry */
> -     fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry); /* and kill it */
>       return 0;
>  }
>  


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to