On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > >> > The latter one looks big because of a rename, but with "-M" it's pretty > >> > trivial. Chris, do you agree? > >> > >> Is the minimal fix to just add "| IRQF_ONESHOT" to the request_threaded_irq > >> argument? If so, I'd rather push just that for 3.5, and I can take care of > >> having that change appear simultaneously in linux-next so that there aren't > >> any conflicts. Is that okay with you? > > > > For that you'd have to rebase -next, right? you'd like to do that? > > Yeah, I'm willing to rebase mmc-next for this -- I'd rather send the > simplest possible fix this late in 3.5-rc, and the rebase is simple. > Also, this fix is logically distinct from your rename patch. > > I don't think I need you to send anything more, I'll add the initial > patch adding "| IRQF_ONESHOT", rebase your "extend and rename" patch on > top of that, push both to mmc-next, and then send the initial patch to > Linus in a few days.
Great, thanks for taking care of this! Regards Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
