Hi Vinod On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 14:47 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > > Yes, that's right - these values have to be written to DMAC channel > > > > configuration registers, so, we do not have to change anything, those > > > > values can remain DMAC parameters and be passed to it directly from > > > > platform data. > > > Can you get that in future fixes. > > > > Sorry, what exactly would you like to have fixed here? Above I just > > described how the driver already functions, what changes do you see > > necessary? > Why should client pass these two values. So the parameters which can be > calculated should be, and rest should dmacs platform data and not > clients. Hm, let me try again: > > > > those > > > > values can remain DMAC parameters and be passed to it directly from > > > > platform data. i.e., from DMAC's platform data, they are _not_ passed from clients. Am I still missing something? > And after the removal of the slave and adddr fields, you find that you > no longer need your specific slave structure and that can be elimnated > completely. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
