On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
<sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * Jovi Zhang <bookj...@gmail.com> [2012-07-18 11:08:42]:
>
>> From 68232ef2decae95b807f2f3763e8ea99c1a3b2ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Jovi Zhang <bookj...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 17:51:26 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: fix misleading log entry
>>
>> There don't have any 'r' prefix in uprobe event naming, remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jovi Zhang <bookj...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> index cf382de..852a584 100644
>> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>> @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static int create_trace_uprobe(int argc, char **argv)
>> if (argv[0][0] == '-')
>> is_delete = true;
>> else if (argv[0][0] != 'p') {
>> - pr_info("Probe definition must be started with 'p', 'r' or" "
>> '-'.\n");
>> + pr_info("Probe definition must be started with 'p' or '-'.\n");
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>
> Yes, uprobes doesnt support return probes. So we should not have
> mentioned about r.
Hmm, Does this have specific reason? or just not implemented?
>
> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
