On 07/25/2012 10:33 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2012, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> It is certainly not through does the same method as SLAB, right ?
>> Writing to /proc/slabinfo gives me an I/O error
>> I assume it is something through sysfs, but schiming through the code
>> now, I can't find any per-cache tunables. Would you mind pointing me to
>> them?
>
> The slab attributes in /sys/kernel/slab/<slabname>/<attr> can be modified
> for some values. I think that could be the default method for the future
> since it allows easy addition of new tunables as needed.
>
Christoph, would the following PoC patch be enough?
>From 7c582c5c6321cbde93c5e73c6c2096b4432a2a04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Glauber Costa <glom...@parallels.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:19:08 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] slub propagation
---
mm/slub.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 55946c3..a136a75 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -5130,6 +5130,10 @@ static ssize_t slab_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj,
struct slab_attribute *attribute;
struct kmem_cache *s;
int err;
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
+ struct kmem_cache *c;
+ struct mem_cgroup_cache_params *p;
+#endif
attribute = to_slab_attr(attr);
s = to_slab(kobj);
@@ -5138,7 +5142,19 @@ static ssize_t slab_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj,
return -EIO;
err = attribute->store(s, buf, len);
+#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM
+ if (slab_state < FULL)
+ return err;
+ if ((err < 0) || (s->memcg_params.id == -1))
+ return err;
+
+ list_for_each_entry(p, &s->memcg_params.sibling_list, sibling_list) {
+ c = container_of(p, struct kmem_cache, memcg_params);
+ /* return value determined by the parent cache only */
+ attribute->store(c, buf, len);
+ }
+#endif
return err;
}
--
1.7.10.4
