On 07/26/2012 01:55 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Tim Gardner <[email protected]> wrote:
Cc: Jon Mason <[email protected]>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Perches <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c |    9 +++++++--
  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
index de21904..d4832b2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/vxge/vxge-main.c
@@ -4203,6 +4203,9 @@ out:
         return ret;
  }

+#define VXGE_PXE_FIRMWARE "vxge/X3fw-pxe.ncf"
+#define VXGE_FIRMWARE "vxge/X3fw.ncf"
+
  static int vxge_probe_fw_update(struct vxgedev *vdev)
  {
         u32 maj, min, bld;
@@ -4245,9 +4248,9 @@ static int vxge_probe_fw_update(struct vxgedev *vdev)
                         }
         }
         if (gpxe)
-               fw_name = "vxge/X3fw-pxe.ncf";
+               fw_name = VXGE_PXE_FIRMWARE;
         else
-               fw_name = "vxge/X3fw.ncf";
+               fw_name = VXGE_FIRMWARE;

         ret = vxge_fw_upgrade(vdev, fw_name, 0);
         /* -EINVAL and -ENOENT are not fatal errors for flashing firmware on
@@ -4855,3 +4858,5 @@ vxge_closer(void)
  }
  module_init(vxge_starter);
  module_exit(vxge_closer);
+MODULE_FIRMWARE(VXGE_PXE_FIRMWARE);
+MODULE_FIRMWARE(VXGE_FIRMWARE);

IIUC, MODULE_FIRMWARE is only necessary for devices that need firmware
to operate.  vxge hardware has an image in flash on the nic, and the
modified code is used to update the firmware image on the adapter.
So, this change isn't doing what you want it to do.

Also, wasn't this already discussed (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/12/401)?

Thanks,
Jon


Hmm, I'd forgotten about that discussion, but its no more correct now then it was then. MODULE_FIRMWARE is purely informational and has _no_ runtime impact. It is merely an indicator that a firmware file _might_ be used by the kernel and should therefore be left in the external firmware package. MODULE_FIRMWARE() uses the same base MODULE_INFO macro as MODULE_VERSION, MODULE_AUTHOR, MODULE_LICENSE, etc.

rtg
--
Tim Gardner [email protected]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to