From: liu chuansheng <chuansheng....@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/fixup_irq: using the cpu_online_mask instead of
cpu_all_mask
When one CPU is going down, and this CPU is the last one in irq affinity,
current code is setting cpu_all_mask as the new affinity for that irq.
But for some system the firmware maybe send the interrupt to each CPU
in irq affinity averagely, and cpu_all_mask include all CPUs.
Here replacing cpu_all_mask with cpu_online_mask, it is more reasonable
and fittable.
Signed-off-by: liu chuansheng <chuansheng....@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 7ad683d..d44f782 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
break_affinity = 1;
- affinity = cpu_all_mask;
+ affinity = cpu_online_mask;
}
chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
