On 08/07/2012 01:17 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

Since I am motivated to get things done, and since there has been much
grumbling about my patches not implementing tunables, I have added
tunable support on top of my last patchset.

I have performed basic testing on the these patches and nothing
appears amis.

The sm statemachine is a major tease as it has all of these association
and endpoint pointers in the common set of function parameters that turn
out to be NULL at the most inconvinient times.  So I added to the common
parameter list a struct net pointer, that is never NULL.

  include/net/netns/sctp.h   |   96 +++++++-
  include/net/sctp/sctp.h    |   16 +-
  include/net/sctp/sm.h      |    8 +-
  include/net/sctp/structs.h |  126 +---------
  net/sctp/associola.c       |   18 +-
  net/sctp/auth.c            |   20 ++-
  net/sctp/bind_addr.c       |    6 +-
  net/sctp/endpointola.c     |   13 +-
  net/sctp/input.c           |    6 +-
  net/sctp/primitive.c       |    4 +-
  net/sctp/protocol.c        |  137 +++++-----
  net/sctp/sm_make_chunk.c   |   61 +++--
  net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c   |   26 ++-
  net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c    |  631 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
  net/sctp/sm_statetable.c   |   17 +-
  net/sctp/socket.c          |   92 ++++---
  net/sctp/sysctl.c          |  200 ++++++++------
  net/sctp/transport.c       |   23 +-
  18 files changed, 817 insertions(+), 683 deletions(-)

Eric W. Biederman (7):
       sctp: Add infrastructure for per net sysctls
       sctp: Push struct net down to sctp_chunk_event_lookup
       sctp: Push struct net down into sctp_transport_init
       sctp: Push struct net down into sctp_in_scope
       sctp: Push struct net down into all of the state machine functions
       sctp: Push struct net down into sctp_verify_ext_param
       sctp: Making sysctl tunables per net

Eric



Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com>

To this entire follow-on series.  This is much better.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to