it makes no sense to mark our IRQ handler inline
since it's passed as a function pointer when
enabling the IRQ line.

Tested-by: Shubhrajyoti D <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
index 9068260..d244163 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static void serial_omap_rdi(struct uart_omap_port *up, 
unsigned int lsr)
  * @irq: uart port irq number
  * @dev_id: uart port info
  */
-static inline irqreturn_t serial_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
+static irqreturn_t serial_omap_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
        struct uart_omap_port *up = dev_id;
        struct tty_struct *tty = up->port.state->port.tty;
-- 
1.7.12.rc3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to