于 2012年09月07日 10:43, Shawn Guo 写道:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:38:41PM -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
We call the get_device() in the mxs_auart_probe().
For the balance of the reference count, we should put the
device in the mxs_auart_remove().
Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie<[email protected]>
---
drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
index ea5f888..6898413 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
@@ -796,6 +796,7 @@ static int __devexit mxs_auart_remove(struct
platform_device *pdev)
auart_port[pdev->id] = NULL;
+ put_device(s->dev);
clk_put(s->clk);
free_irq(s->irq, s);
kfree(s);
So the error path of probe needs function fixing too, right?
OK.
Send out the new version right now.
Huang Shijie
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
