On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:12:23AM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Lee Jones <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > These properties have no place here as the populated nodes are >> > not related to GPIO Controllers. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> >> >> Squash this into the previous patch adding them... >> I think Arnd already noted. > > Well he noted that I'd duplicated the error from the snowball.dts > file, then rectified in this patch, which is fair enough. However, > I don't think the snowball.dts fix should be squashed into an HREF > enablement patch, and I can't find a suitable patch in the patch- > set where it would really fit. Should I leave the Snowball fix > separate and just fixup the HREF .dts file to never duplicate the > anomaly?
No you're right, this should be separate. I was confused that it was in the same patch set, I would suggest just sending this one on it's own as a snowball fix fair and square, and have ARM SoC push it to the -rcs as a regression fix, but your choice. Acked-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]> Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
