On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:04:49PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 18 September 2012, Simon Horman wrote: > > > I agree it's not nice to have to do this, but this is largely because > > > of shmobile doing things differently from all other ARM platforms, on > > > which the respective patches tend to clean up things and reduce the > > > number of type casts. > > > > > > The only alternative I can see is for shmobile to introduce its own > > > mach/io.h file with the relaxed type checking, but that would only > > > defer the problem until the point where you want shmobile to be part > > > of the common multiplatform kernel binary. > > > > If it is needed in the long term, then I'm happy with it going in now. > > Could you remove the portion that Paul objected to? > > Yes, I already did that.
Great, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
