On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 19:45 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:

> Let's have an example here.
> 
> sched_init_numa()
> {
>       ...
>       // A loop set sched_domains_numa_levels to level.-------------1
> 
>       // I set sched_domains_numa_levels to 0.
>       sched_domains_numa_levels = 0;--------------------------------2

Ah, ok, so this 'idiot in a hurry' (aka. me) placed the hunk wrong and
thought it was at the start of the function.

>       // A loop allocating memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[][]
>       for (i = 0; i < level; i++) {
>               ......
>               // Allocate memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[i]----3
>               ......
>       }
>       ......
> 
>       // I reset sched_domains_numa_levels to level.
>       sched_domains_numa_levels = level;----------------------------4
> }

Yes this makes sense, it might be best to have this as a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to