Hi Peter~

I will make a v2 patch-set following your comments
and resent it soon. :)

Thanks. :)

On 09/25/2012 07:50 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-25 at 19:45 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:


Let's have an example here.

sched_init_numa()
{
        ...
        // A loop set sched_domains_numa_levels to level.-------------1

        // I set sched_domains_numa_levels to 0.
        sched_domains_numa_levels = 0;--------------------------------2

Ah, ok, so this 'idiot in a hurry' (aka. me) placed the hunk wrong and
thought it was at the start of the function.

        // A loop allocating memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[][]
        for (i = 0; i<  level; i++) {
                ......
                // Allocate memory for sched_domains_numa_masks[i]----3
                ......
        }
        ......

        // I reset sched_domains_numa_levels to level.
        sched_domains_numa_levels = level;----------------------------4
}

Yes this makes sense, it might be best to have this as a separate patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to