* a...@linux-foundation.org <a...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > The flush tlb optimization code has logical issue on UV > platform. It doesn't flush the full range at all, since it > simply ignores its 'end' parameter (and hence also the "all" > indicator) in uv_flush_tlb_others() function.
In other words it's a user-space data corruptor showstopper bug fix for the UV platform, which should get high tip:x86/urgent priority, right? It's generally useful to put such info right into the patch title. 'fix issue' sounds a tad too harmless. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/