On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:41:10PM +0200, Davide Ciminaghi wrote: > Maybe there's another solution: what about adding a couple of function > pointers (lock, unlock) to struct regmap_config ? If they're set to NULL, > everything works as usual. If they're not NULL, regmap uses such functions > to do locking and unlocking instead of the usual ones (and regmap_bus.fast_io > is ignored). I think this wouldn't hurt existing regmap users and allow > sta2x11-mfd to have just one spinlock for everything, no need for nested > locking this way.
That might work, yes, and would be generally useful I think. Or we could add regmap based versions of the clock utilities (which would also be useful anyway). Or both. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
