Hi,

On Monday 22 October 2012 03:33:19 Li Yang-R58472 wrote:
> On Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:37 AM Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 06:19:26PM +0100, Simon Haggett wrote:
> > > Some gadget drivers may attempt to dequeue requests for an endpoint
> > > that has already been disabled. For example, in the UVC gadget driver,
> > > uvc_function_set_alt() will call usb_ep_disable() when alt setting 0
> > > is selected. When the userspace application subsequently issues the
> > > VIDIOC_STREAMOFF ioctl, uvc_video_enable() invokes usb_ep_dequeue() to
> > 
> > ensure that all requests have been cancelled.
> > 
> > bug is on uvc gadget, then. Laurent ?

We've discussed this topic a couple of months before. I believe that's not a 
bug.

http://68.183.106.108/lists/linux-usb/msg68869.html

> > Also, fsl should be removed from the tree, I'm trying to persuade iMX
> > folks to use drivers/usb/chipidea instead.
> 
> Besides the iMX usage, the driver is also being used by many Freescale
> PowerPC/Coldfire SoCs.  I agree that it's ideal to move to a common driver.
> But it is a large task to make the chipidea driver works for all the
> hardware that fsl_udc had supported and been tested on.
>
> > > For the Freescale High Speed Dual-Role USB controller,
> > > fsl_ep_dequeue() provides the implementation of usb_ep_dequeue(). If
> > > this is called for a disabled endpoint, a kernel oops will occur when
> > 
> > the ep->ep.desc field is dereferenced (by ep_index()).
> > 
> > > fsl_ep_disable() sets this field to NULL, as well as deleting all
> > > pending requests for the endpoint.
> > > 
> > > This patch adds an additional check to fsl_ep_dequeue() to ensure that
> > > the endpoint has not already been disabled before attempting to dequeue
> > 
> > requests.
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Simon Haggett <simon.hagg...@realvnc.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c |    5 ++++-
> > >  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
> > > b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
> > > index 6ae70cb..acd513b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/fsl_udc_core.c
> > > @@ -955,7 +955,10 @@ static int fsl_ep_dequeue(struct usb_ep *_ep,
> > struct usb_request *_req)
> > 
> > >   int ep_num, stopped, ret = 0;
> > >   u32 epctrl;
> > > 
> > > - if (!_ep || !_req)
> > > + /* Ensure that the ep and request are valid, and the ep is not
> > > +  * disabled
> > > +  */
> > > + if (!_ep || !_req || !ep->ep.desc)
> > >           return -EINVAL;

Shouldn't that last check be done with a lock taken ?

> > >   spin_lock_irqsave(&ep->udc->lock, flags);

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to