Namjae Jeon <linkinj...@gmail.com> writes:
> + blknr = fat_clus_to_blknr(sbi, parent_logstart);
> + parent_bh = sb_bread(sb, blknr);
> + if (!parent_bh) {
> + fat_msg(sb, KERN_ERR,
> + "NFS:unable to read cluster of parent
> directory");
> + goto out;
> }
> + de = (struct msdos_dir_entry *) parent_bh->b_data;
> + clus_to_match = fat_get_start(sbi, &de[0]);
> + search_clus = fat_get_start(sbi, &de[1]);
> + if (!search_clus)
> + search_clus = sbi->root_cluster;
> + brelse(parent_bh);
> + do {
> + parent_inode = fat_traverse_cluster(sb,
> + search_clus, clus_to_match);
> + if (IS_ERR(parent_inode) || parent_inode)
> + break;
> + search_clus = fat_read_next_clus(sb,
> + search_clus);
> + if (search_clus < 0)
> + break;
> + } while (search_clus != FAT_ENT_EOF);
> }
> out:
> brelse(dotdot_bh);
I started to understand what is doing this with cleanup. It is really
strange and duplicates many codes with bugs.
So, please replace whole FAT nfs patches in -mm to review whole at next
patchset. And sorry, but please think whole more carefully.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirof...@mail.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
