On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 09:00:53 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 12/12/2012 07:50 PM, Julius Werner wrote:
> > Thanks again for making this happen, Daniel. I like this version,
> > except for the small nitpick that I still think it would make sense to
> > also turn the loop in menu.c around. How about something like this:
> > 
> >        for (i = drv->state_count - 1; i >= CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i++) 
> > {
> >                 struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
> >                 if (!s->disable && s->exit_latency <= latency_req &&
> >                     s->target_residency <= data->predicted_us &&
> >                     s->exit_latency * multiplier <= data->predicted_us) {
> >                         data->last_state_idx = i;
> >                         data->exit_us = s->exit_latency;
> >                         break;
> >                 }
> >         }
> 
> Actually I was planning to do that in a separate patch.

Can you submit that second patch too, please, so that people don't have to
wonder?

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to