On 12/12/2012 11:42 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 09:00:53 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 12/12/2012 07:50 PM, Julius Werner wrote:
>>> Thanks again for making this happen, Daniel. I like this version,
>>> except for the small nitpick that I still think it would make sense to
>>> also turn the loop in menu.c around. How about something like this:
>>>
>>> for (i = drv->state_count - 1; i >= CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i++)
>>> {
>>> struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
>>> if (!s->disable && s->exit_latency <= latency_req &&
>>> s->target_residency <= data->predicted_us &&
>>> s->exit_latency * multiplier <= data->predicted_us) {
>>> data->last_state_idx = i;
>>> data->exit_us = s->exit_latency;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> Actually I was planning to do that in a separate patch.
>
> Can you submit that second patch too, please, so that people don't have to
> wonder?
Sure.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
