Also sprach Alan Cox:
} > - default:
} > + default:;
}
} Agree - done
}
This kind of coding makes me want to cry. What's so wrong with:
default:
break;
instead? The ';' is hard to notice and, if people don't leave the
"default:" at the end, then bad things could happen...
--
|| Bill Wendling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Bill Wendling
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Stephen Satchell
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Horst von Brand

