On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Also sprach Alan Cox:
>
> } > - default:
> } > + default:;
> }
> } Agree - done
> }
> This kind of coding makes me want to cry. What's so wrong with:
>
> default:
> break;
>
> instead? The ';' is hard to notice and
I agree. I'd much prefer that syntax also.
Or just remove the "default:" altogether, when it doesn't make any
difference.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Bill Wendling
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Stephen Satchell
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Wright
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Andrew Morton
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings J . A . Magallon
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warning... Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Ion Badulescu
- Re: [PATCH] gcc-3.0 warnings Horst von Brand

