On Fri, 14 Sep 2012 08:40:12 +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 09:19 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > > I was checking why this spinlock was never initialized, but it turns > > out it's not used anywhere, so we can drop it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <[email protected]> > > Cc: Vinod Koul <[email protected]> > > Cc: Dan Williams <[email protected]> > > --- > > I can't even build-test this. > > > > drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c | 1 - > > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- linux-3.6-rc4.orig/drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c 2012-08-04 > > 21:49:26.000000000 +0200 > > +++ linux-3.6-rc4/drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c 2012-09-06 09:13:31.034228670 > > +0200 > > @@ -45,7 +45,6 @@ static void ipu_write_reg(struct ipu *ip > > struct ipu_irq_bank { > > unsigned int control; > > unsigned int status; > > - spinlock_t lock; > > struct ipu *ipu; > > }; > > Dan, you okay with this?
What happened to this patch? Dan, please? -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
