From: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>

Current perf test code tries to execute python version 2 in order to
test attributes on perf_event_open syscall.  However it's not default
python version anymore a system can have python v3 only or v2 with a
different name (e.g. python2).  So if there's no such python
interpreter with the name 'python', the test would fail like this
(yes, it's happened on my new archlinux laptop :).

13: struct perf_event_attr setup                 :sh: python: command not found
 FAILED!

As we can pass name of the python interpreter on make, use it for
the attr test also.

Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <[email protected]>
---
 tools/perf/Makefile     | 2 +-
 tools/perf/tests/attr.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
index 7d6d2846477b..2e9a287b3a23 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
@@ -952,7 +952,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)util/exec_cmd.o: util/exec_cmd.c 
$(OUTPUT)PERF-CFLAGS
 
 $(OUTPUT)tests/attr.o: tests/attr.c $(OUTPUT)PERF-CFLAGS
        $(QUIET_CC)$(CC) -o $@ -c $(ALL_CFLAGS) \
-               '-DBINDIR="$(bindir_SQ)"' \
+               '-DBINDIR="$(bindir_SQ)"' -DPYTHON='"$(PYTHON_WORD)"' \
                $<
 
 $(OUTPUT)util/config.o: util/config.c $(OUTPUT)PERF-CFLAGS
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/attr.c b/tools/perf/tests/attr.c
index 25638a986257..6a6be5ea1311 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/attr.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/attr.c
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ static int run_dir(const char *d, const char *perf)
 {
        char cmd[3*PATH_MAX];
 
-       snprintf(cmd, 3*PATH_MAX, "python %s/attr.py -d %s/attr/ -p %s %s",
+       snprintf(cmd, 3*PATH_MAX, PYTHON " %s/attr.py -d %s/attr/ -p %s %s",
                 d, d, perf, verbose ? "-v" : "");
 
        return system(cmd);
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to