On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:39:59AM +0100, Cong Ding wrote:
> clean the checkpatch warnings in ring_sw.c. mostly are 80 characters per line
> issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cong Ding <ding...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/ring_sw.c |   25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/ring_sw.c b/drivers/staging/iio/ring_sw.c
> index 3a45f9a..4db1cc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/ring_sw.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/ring_sw.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ static int iio_store_to_sw_ring(struct iio_sw_ring_buffer 
> *ring,
>                * as long as the read pointer is valid before this
>                * passes it - guaranteed as set later in this function.
>                */
> -             ring->half_p = ring->data - 
> ring->buf.length*ring->buf.bytes_per_datum/2;
> +             ring->half_p = ring->data -
> +                     ring->buf.length*ring->buf.bytes_per_datum/2;

Please put spaces around the '*' and '/' characters.
                        ring->buf.length * ring->buf.bytes_per_datum / 2;

>       }
>       /* Copy data to where ever the current write pointer says */
>       memcpy(ring->write_p, data, ring->buf.bytes_per_datum);
> @@ -112,8 +113,8 @@ static int iio_store_to_sw_ring(struct iio_sw_ring_buffer 
> *ring,
>       else if (ring->write_p == ring->read_p) {
>               change_test_ptr = ring->read_p;
>               temp_ptr = change_test_ptr + ring->buf.bytes_per_datum;
> -             if (temp_ptr
> -                 == ring->data + ring->buf.length*ring->buf.bytes_per_datum) 
> {
> +             if (temp_ptr == ring->data +
> +                 ring->buf.length*ring->buf.bytes_per_datum) {

This needs spaces as well.  It might look cleaner if you broke it
up like this:
                if (temp_ptr == ring->data + ring->buf.length *
                                ring->buf.bytes_per_datum) {


>                       temp_ptr = ring->data;
>               }
>               /* We are moving pointer on one because the ring is full.  Any
> @@ -127,7 +128,8 @@ static int iio_store_to_sw_ring(struct iio_sw_ring_buffer 
> *ring,
>        * simultaneous read */
>       /* Also need to use loop count to ensure this only happens once */
>       ring->half_p += ring->buf.bytes_per_datum;
> -     if (ring->half_p == ring->data + 
> ring->buf.length*ring->buf.bytes_per_datum)
> +     if (ring->half_p == ring->data +
> +                     ring->buf.length*ring->buf.bytes_per_datum)

Same.

>               ring->half_p = ring->data;
>       if (ring->half_p == ring->read_p) {
>               ring->buf.stufftoread = true;
> @@ -153,7 +155,8 @@ static int iio_read_first_n_sw_rb(struct iio_buffer *r,
>       if (n % ring->buf.bytes_per_datum) {
>               ret = -EINVAL;
>               printk(KERN_INFO "Ring buffer read request not whole number of"
> -                    "samples: Request bytes %zd, Current bytes per datum 
> %d\n",
> +                    "samples: Request bytes %zd, Current bytes per"
> +                    "datum %d\n",

No space between "of" and "samples" and also "per" and "datum".

The warning here is that the print should be on one line instead of
two.  But actually that is a decision for the maintainer.
Checkpatch.pl is not the king of us, we do not have to do what it
says.

>                      n, ring->buf.bytes_per_datum);
>               goto error_ret;
>       }
> @@ -193,7 +196,8 @@ static int iio_read_first_n_sw_rb(struct iio_buffer *r,
>       if (initial_write_p >= initial_read_p)
>               data_available = initial_write_p - initial_read_p;
>       else
> -             data_available = buffer_size - (initial_read_p - 
> initial_write_p);
> +             data_available = buffer_size -
> +                     (initial_read_p - initial_write_p);
>  
>       if (data_available < bytes_to_rip)
>               bytes_to_rip = data_available;
> @@ -201,7 +205,8 @@ static int iio_read_first_n_sw_rb(struct iio_buffer *r,
>       if (initial_read_p + bytes_to_rip >= ring->data + buffer_size) {
>               max_copied = ring->data + buffer_size - initial_read_p;
>               memcpy(data, initial_read_p, max_copied);
> -             memcpy(data + max_copied, ring->data, bytes_to_rip - 
> max_copied);
> +             memcpy(data + max_copied,
> +                             ring->data, bytes_to_rip - max_copied);

Line it up like this:
                memcpy(data + max_copied, ring->data,
                       bytes_to_rip - max_copied);


[tab][tab][space][space][space][space][space][space][space]bytes_

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to