On Fri, 2012-12-28 at 11:07 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > We do have such machines, which is why this change has been reverted twice > already. I believe we should stick to the priority scheme I proposed a few > weeks ago.
I seem to have missed that discussion, and couldn't find it after a
brief search. Got a pointer?
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
