On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de> wrote: > At Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:50:05 +0800, > Ming Lei wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de> wrote: >> > >> > But it's supposed to be cached, no? >> >> Generally it will be cached, but some crazy devices might come as new >> device during resume, so we still need to handle the situation. > > In that case, shouldn't we simply return an error instead of > usermodehelper lock (at least for direct loading)?
The check depends on usermodehelper_read_trylock now, is there other simpler way to do the check? Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
