On 02/09/2013 07:34 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
The debugfs files really need to hold the gpiolib spinlock before
accessing the list. Otherwise chip addition/removal will cause an oops.
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca>
Tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acour...@nvidia.com>
Just wondering: if we manage to change this spinlock into a mutex in the
future, wouldn't it be better to acquire it only once in
gpiolib_seq_start() and release it in gpiolib_seq_stop()?
Even though the protection introduced by this patch definitely improves
the situation, it seems to me that chips could still be removed while
being displayed by gpiolib_seq_show().
Thanks,
Alex.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/