On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:46:27 +0100, Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2013-02-11 01:23, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 15:53:43 +0100, Andreas Larsson <[email protected]> 
> > wrote:
> >> Holes in the cs-gpios DT phandle list is supposed to mark that native
> >> chipselects is to be used. The value returned from of_get_named_gpio_flags 
> >> in
> >> this case is -EEXIST. By initializing cs_gpios and cs_gpio with -EEXIST, 
> >> this
> >> and only this errno will indicate to a spi controller driver that a native
> >> chipselect is to be used.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Larsson <[email protected]>
> >
> > I've left this one off for now. Take a look at the patch I posted and
> > let me know if you think this one should still be applied.
> 
> I think that of_spi_register_master should return an error when the 
> cs-gpios property is broken (part of patch 2) and that cs_gpios and 
> cs_gpio should be initialized to the same value as a hole in the plist.
> 
> This patch does not work without 1 and 2, so I'll submit a modified 
> patch once "of: Create function for counting number of phandles in a 
> property" has stabilized. Would it have to go through the gpio branch then?

I'll put it through the DT branch since that is where I'll put the
of_count_phandle patch (assuming it is ready for the 3.9 merge window).

g.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to