On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 12:46:36PM -0500, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
> The recent changes overhauling fs/aio.c introduced a bug that results in the
> kioctx not being freed when outstanding kiocbs are cancelled at exit_aio()
> time.  Specifically, a kiocb that is cancelled has its completion events
> discarded by batch_complete_aio(), which then fails to wake up the process
> stuck in free_ioctx().  Fix this by adding a wake_up() in batch_complete_aio()
> and modifying the wait_event() condition in free_ioctx() appropriately.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin LaHaise <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/aio.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index dc52b0c..46f9dd0 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -335,7 +335,9 @@ static void free_ioctx(struct kioctx *ctx)
>       kunmap_atomic(ring);
>  
>       while (atomic_read(&ctx->reqs_available) < ctx->nr) {
> -             wait_event(ctx->wait, head != ctx->shadow_tail);
> +             wait_event(ctx->wait,
> +                        (head != ctx->shadow_tail) ||
> +                        (atomic_read(&ctx->reqs_available) != ctx->nr));

That test looks backwards - I think we want to wait until reqs_available
== ctx->nr

>  
>               avail = (head <= ctx->shadow_tail ?
>                        ctx->shadow_tail : ctx->nr) - head;
> @@ -754,6 +756,7 @@ void batch_complete_aio(struct batch_complete *batch)
>                        * with free_ioctx()
>                        */
>                       atomic_inc(&req->ki_ctx->reqs_available);
> +                     wake_up(&req->ki_ctx->wait);
>                       aio_put_req(req);
>                       continue;
>               }
> -- 
> 1.7.4.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> "Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to