On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:38:59PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> That allows APEI GHES driver to report errors directly, using
> the EDAC error report API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/edac/edac_core.h | 17 ++++++++
> drivers/edac/edac_mc.c | 109
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> index 23bb99f..9c5da11 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_core.h
> @@ -453,6 +453,23 @@ extern struct mem_ctl_info *find_mci_by_dev(struct
> device *dev);
> extern struct mem_ctl_info *edac_mc_del_mc(struct device *dev);
> extern int edac_mc_find_csrow_by_page(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> unsigned long page);
> +
> +void edac_raw_mc_handle_error(const enum hw_event_mc_err_type type,
> + struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
> + long grain,
> + const u16 error_count,
> + const int top_layer,
> + const int mid_layer,
> + const int low_layer,
> + const unsigned long page_frame_number,
> + const unsigned long offset_in_page,
> + const unsigned long syndrome,
> + const char *msg,
> + const char *location,
> + const char *label,
> + const char *other_detail,
> + const bool enable_per_layer_report);
Why not merge this patch with 10/12?
You're adding edac_raw_mc_handle_error here and rewriting it in 10/12.
This looks like unnecessary churn to me.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
