On 03/20/2013 09:46 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas wrote: > This looks pretty good! > > I rather like the (lack of) locking in I/O completion (around the req > count vs. target/queue binding). It is unfortunate that you need to hold the > per-target lock in virtscsi_pick_vq() though; have any idea > how much that lock hurts?
Paolo? > > Just two minor comments: > > (in struct virtio_scsi_target_data): > + /* This spinlock never help at the same time as vq_lock. */ > ^^^^ held? > > (in struct virtio_scsi): > + /* Does the affinity hint is set for virtqueues? */ > Could you rephrase that, please? Thank you, fixed in V6, please review. > > Tested on qemu and w/ Google Compute Engine's virtio-scsi device. Cool. > > Reviewed-and-tested-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkate...@google.com> Do you mind review and test the V6? Thank you. Regards, Wanlong Gao > > Thanks, > -- vs; > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
