On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Nicolas Schichan <nschic...@freebox.fr> > wrote: >> Architecture must select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER_JIT and implement >> seccomp_jit_compile() and seccomp_jit_free() if they intend to support >> jitted seccomp filters. >> >> struct seccomp_filter has been moved to <linux/seccomp.h> to make its >> content available to the jit compilation code. >> >> In a way similar to the net BPF, the jit compilation code is expected >> to updates struct seccomp_filter.bpf_func pointer to the generated >> code. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Schichan <nschic...@freebox.fr> > > Acked-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> > > I'd love to see this for x86 too. I suspect it'd be a small change > after this series lands.
Agreed - and thanks for working through the necessary changes! Acked-By: Will Drewry <w...@chromium.org> (for the series) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
