On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:48:10PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > This series removes TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, as promised/threatened at > http://lwn.net/Articles/541037/ and https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/545. > > 1. Remove TINY_PREEMPT_RCU. This is a straight syntactic removal, > with no attempt at cleanup. The remaining patches do the cleanup. > > 2. Inline the now-empty show_tiny_preempt_stats() function. > > 3. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_check_callbacks() function. > > 4. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_remove_callbacks() function. > > 5. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_process_callbacks() function. > > 6. Because TINY_RCU no longer has kthreads, remove the code that > used to abstract away kthread vs. softirq invocation. > > 7. Inline the now-empty check_cpu_stall_preempt() function. > > 8. Remove CONFIG_TINY_RCU ifdefs from include/linux/rcutiny.h > > 9. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() function. > > 10. Move code to allow consolidating ifdefs in kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h. > > 11. Remove TINY_PREEMPT_RCU's tracing formats from documentation. > > 12. Shrink TINY_RCU a bit by moving exit_rcu() to TREE_RCU, leaving > TINY_RCU with a static inline empty function.
For 2-7 and 9-12: Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]> I responded to patch 8 with a note about moving part of it to patch 1; with that changed, Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]> for those two as well. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
