On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:30:49AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:48:10PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > This series removes TINY_PREEMPT_RCU, as promised/threatened at
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/541037/ and https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/545.
> >
> > 1. Remove TINY_PREEMPT_RCU. This is a straight syntactic removal,
> > with no attempt at cleanup. The remaining patches do the cleanup.
> >
> > 2. Inline the now-empty show_tiny_preempt_stats() function.
> >
> > 3. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_check_callbacks() function.
> >
> > 4. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_remove_callbacks() function.
> >
> > 5. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_process_callbacks() function.
> >
> > 6. Because TINY_RCU no longer has kthreads, remove the code that
> > used to abstract away kthread vs. softirq invocation.
> >
> > 7. Inline the now-empty check_cpu_stall_preempt() function.
> >
> > 8. Remove CONFIG_TINY_RCU ifdefs from include/linux/rcutiny.h
> >
> > 9. Inline the now-empty rcu_preempt_note_context_switch() function.
> >
> > 10. Move code to allow consolidating ifdefs in kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h.
> >
> > 11. Remove TINY_PREEMPT_RCU's tracing formats from documentation.
> >
> > 12. Shrink TINY_RCU a bit by moving exit_rcu() to TREE_RCU, leaving
> > TINY_RCU with a static inline empty function.
>
> For 2-7 and 9-12:
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
>
> I responded to patch 8 with a note about moving part of it to patch 1;
> with that changed,
> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <[email protected]>
> for those two as well.
Thank you for the review, and good point on merging patch 8 into patch 1,
will do!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
