* Andi Kleen <a...@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> v11: Rebase to perf/core. Fix extra regs. Rename INTX.
Actually, you did not do what I asked you to do, to rename INTX to IN_TX,
you still kept the 'INTX' pattern that is confusingly similar to
interrupts related names like 'INT3'.
I still see, even your latest patch, this:
+#define HSW_INTX (1ULL << 32)
+#define HSW_INTX_CHECKPOINTED (1ULL << 33)
Why are you ignoring maintainer requests, repeatedly?
It woulnd't be a big issue and I'd do the rename myself if this wasn't a
repeat pattern of passive-aggressive obstruction from you spanning several
years, resisting or obstructing maintainer feedback whenever you can ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
