On Wed, 15 May 2013, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2013-05-15 10:01:03, Will Deacon wrote: > > My second (less stupid) version of the patch prints "not reported".
Even then, you should tell the truth and say "not available" or "not applicable". > > I'd be happy to remove the line altogether if people get behind the > > decision though. You certainly have my ACK. > > In fact, I just tried it and at least my linaro filesystem seems happy > > enough. > > Would it be too much work to simply put the field back with the right > value? We don't have to get it as precise as we used to, that should > make slowdown minimum. There is simply no right value. And whenever there is a value, people read too much into it. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
