On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 02:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > Now that I am more awake... > > The RCU list macros assume that the list header is either statically > allocated (in which case no ACCESS_ONCE() or whatever is needed) or > that the caller did whatever was necessary to protect the list header, > whether that be holding the right lock, using rcu_dereference() when > traversing the pointer to the list header, or whatever.
Not sure what you mean, we do hold rcu_read_lock() here. But when we jump back to begin, we do not do "rcu_read_unlock()/rcu_read_lock()" pair. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
