On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:47 AM, johnspaul92 <jo...@ti.com> wrote: > When i tried to apply the GrSecurity patch on linux kernel 3.10 and there the > patch actually modifies atomic_set to atomic_set_unchecked. When i checked > the gcc patch to compile this code it just redefines atomic_set as > atomic_set_unchecked. So what is the use of changing the function name.?? Am > I missing something here(i.e have they given a new definition for this > function anywhere else). And i would also like to know what this > function(atomic_set_unchecked. I know about the atomic_set function) is > used for.
Isn't this a question for the grsecurity developers? -- Thanks, //richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
