On 28/05/2013 03:26, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 10:44 +0300, Eliezer Tamir wrote:

diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 66772cf..c7c3ea6 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct cg_proto;
    *   @sk_error_report: callback to indicate errors (e.g. %MSG_ERRQUEUE)
    *   @sk_backlog_rcv: callback to process the backlog
    *   @sk_destruct: called at sock freeing time, i.e. when all refcnt == 0
+  *    @sk_napi_id: id of the last napi context to receive data for sk
   */
  struct sock {
        /*
@@ -399,6 +400,9 @@ struct sock {
        int                     (*sk_backlog_rcv)(struct sock *sk,
                                                  struct sk_buff *skb);
        void                    (*sk_destruct)(struct sock *sk);
+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_LL_RX_POLL
+       unsigned int            sk_napi_id;
+#endif
  };

I believe this is a bad choice for data locality.

I would rather move it in the same cache line than sk_rxhash

I will move it to right after sk_rxhash.

-Eliezer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to