On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:40:16AM -0500, Jacob Shin wrote:
> Currently save_microcode_in_initrd() is declared in vendor neutural
> microcode.h file, but defined in vendor specific
> microcode_intel_early.c file. Vendor abstract it out to
> microcode_core_early.c with a wrapper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Shin <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h | 5 +++++
> arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core_early.c | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel_early.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
> index 5356f92..538e407 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/microcode_intel.h
> @@ -67,10 +67,15 @@ update_match_revision(struct microcode_header_intel
> *mc_header, int rev);
> extern void __init load_ucode_intel_bsp(void);
> extern void __cpuinit load_ucode_intel_ap(void);
> extern void show_ucode_info_early(void);
> +extern int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void);
> #else
> static inline __init void load_ucode_intel_bsp(void) {}
> static inline __cpuinit void load_ucode_intel_ap(void) {}
> static inline void show_ucode_info_early(void) {}
> +static inline int __init save_microcode_in_initrd_intel(void)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
We leave those on one line as in the diff I sent you earlier.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
