Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> writes: > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> > --- > Untested. Please note that I don't really understand this comment, but > the fix is correct anyhow.
Applied. And it just means that we can use the kernel (host) macros to operate on the guest page tables, since they are both PAE or both non-PAE. Thanks! Rusty. > drivers/lguest/page_tables.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/lguest/page_tables.c b/drivers/lguest/page_tables.c > index 5b9ac32..a35d8d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/lguest/page_tables.c > +++ b/drivers/lguest/page_tables.c > @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ > /*H:320 > * The page table code is curly enough to need helper functions to keep it > * clear and clean. The kernel itself provides many of them; one advantage > - * of insisting that the Guest and Host use the same CONFIG_PAE setting. > + * of insisting that the Guest and Host use the same CONFIG_X86_PAE setting. > * > * There are two functions which return pointers to the shadow (aka "real") > * page tables. > -- > 1.7.11.7 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/