On Mon, 03 Jun 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Monday 03 June 2013 14:42:32 Lee Jones wrote:
> > @@ -559,6 +559,8 @@
> >                         v-i2c-supply = <&db8500_vape_reg>;
> >  
> >                         clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > +                       clocks = <&clk 100>, <&clk 67>;
> > +                       clock-names = "nmk-i2c.0", "apb_pclk";
> >                 };
> >  
> >                 i2c@80122000 {
> > @@ -572,6 +574,9 @@
> >                         v-i2c-supply = <&db8500_vape_reg>;
> >  
> >                         clock-frequency = <400000>;
> > +
> > +                       clocks = <&clk 85>, <&clk 42>;
> > +                       clock-names = "nmk-i2c.1", "apb_pclk";
> >                 };
> 
> Same comment actually as for the uart patch, also SDI and MSP
> have the same problem.

I was only using the names in the same manor as the API does, to fetch
the 'clocks =' index. Do you mean that I should be using 'uartclk',
'i2cclk', 'sdmmcclk' and 'msp1clk' instead?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to