On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 18:10 +0200, Johannes Schilling wrote:
> resolves checkpatch errors and warnings regarding whitespace around
> operators, line lengths and indentation.
I suggest adding --strict to your checkpatch runs to
report a few more style usage elements.
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/keucr/init.c b/drivers/staging/keucr/init.c
[]
> @@ -98,11 +98,16 @@ int ENE_SMInit(struct us_data *us)
[]
> if (us->SM_Status.Insert && us->SM_Status.Ready) {
> - dev_info(&us->pusb_dev->dev, "Insert = %x\n",
> us->SM_Status.Insert);
[]
> + dev_info(&us->pusb_dev->dev, "Insert = %x\n",
> + us->SM_Status.Insert);
I think this would be nicer aligning the arguments
to the open parenthesis like:
dev_info(&us->pusb_dev->dev, "Insert = %x\n",
us->SM_Status.Insert);
but using
us_info(us, "Insert = %x\n", us->SM_Status.Insert);
would be nicer still and fit 80 cols, etc...
Another option would be to use a macro like:
#define us_show_status(us, field) \
us_info(us, "%-11s= %x\n", #field, us->SM_Status.field)
And these become
us_show_status(us, "Insert");
us_show_status(us, "Ready");
us_show_status(us, "WtP");
etc...
It depends on how many of these actually exist whether
or not a macro is appropriate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
