On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 18:16:50 -0700 [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
> > > Hopefully we can fix this one by adding the missing comment. > > Perhaps we can fix this one by having people who care read the code and > think about what it means? As is obvious from this thread, that approach isn't working. > Seriously if we are adding pids/processes in > the pid namespace why would to clean up the pid namespace? A good way to communicate the design would be to describe the semantics of PIDNS_HASH_ADDING, at its definition site. [idly wonders what the heck pid_namespace.level and pid.level do, sigh] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
