> 
> Paul, could I summary your point here:
> keep current weighted_cpu_load, but add blocked load avg in
> get_rq_runnable_load?
> 
> I will test this change.

Current testing(kbuild, oltp, aim7) don't show clear different on my NHM EP box
between the following and the origin patch, 
the only different is get_rq_runnable_load added blocked_load_avg. in SMP
will test more cases and more box.

---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |  5 +++--
 kernel/sched/proc.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 1e5a5e6..7d5c477 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2968,7 +2968,7 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct 
task_struct *p, int flags)
 /* Used instead of source_load when we know the type == 0 */
 static unsigned long weighted_cpuload(const int cpu)
 {
-       return cpu_rq(cpu)->load.weight;
+       return cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.runnable_load_avg;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -3013,9 +3013,10 @@ static unsigned long cpu_avg_load_per_task(int cpu)
 {
        struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
        unsigned long nr_running = ACCESS_ONCE(rq->nr_running);
+       unsigned long load_avg = rq->cfs.runnable_load_avg;
 
        if (nr_running)
-               return rq->load.weight / nr_running;
+               return load_avg / nr_running;
 
        return 0;
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/proc.c b/kernel/sched/proc.c
index bb3a6a0..36d7db6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/proc.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/proc.c
@@ -501,6 +501,18 @@ static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned 
long this_load,
        sched_avg_update(this_rq);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+unsigned long get_rq_runnable_load(struct rq *rq)
+{
+       return rq->cfs.runnable_load_avg + rq->cfs.blocked_load_avg;
+}
+#else
+unsigned long get_rq_runnable_load(struct rq *rq)
+{
+       return rq->load.weight;
+}
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 /*
  * There is no sane way to deal with nohz on smp when using jiffies because the
@@ -522,7 +534,7 @@ static void __update_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq, unsigned 
long this_load,
 void update_idle_cpu_load(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
        unsigned long curr_jiffies = ACCESS_ONCE(jiffies);
-       unsigned long load = this_rq->load.weight;
+       unsigned long load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
        unsigned long pending_updates;
 
        /*
@@ -568,11 +580,12 @@ void update_cpu_load_nohz(void)
  */
 void update_cpu_load_active(struct rq *this_rq)
 {
+       unsigned long load = get_rq_runnable_load(this_rq);
        /*
         * See the mess around update_idle_cpu_load() / update_cpu_load_nohz().
         */
        this_rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
-       __update_cpu_load(this_rq, this_rq->load.weight, 1);
+       __update_cpu_load(this_rq, load, 1);
 
        calc_load_account_active(this_rq);
 }
-- 
1.7.12

-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to