On 06/22/2013 07:51 AM, Tim Chen wrote:
> Doing cmpxchg will cause cache bouncing when checking
> sem->count. This could cause scalability issue
> in a large machine (e.g. a 80 cores box).
> 
> A pre-read of sem->count can mitigate this.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex....@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.c...@linux.intel.com>

Hi Tim,
there is a technical error in this patch.
the "From: " line should be 'Alex Shi', since he made the most input of
this patch.

And I still think split this patch to 4 smaller will make it more simple
to review, that I had sent you and Davidlohr.

could you like to re-send with my 4 patch version? :)

> ---
>  include/asm-generic/rwsem.h |    8 ++++----
>  lib/rwsem.c                 |   21 +++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
> index bb1e2cd..052d973 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
> @@ -70,11 +70,11 @@ static inline void __down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>  
>  static inline int __down_write_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
>  {
> -     long tmp;
> +     if (unlikely(&sem->count != RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE))
> +             return 0;
>  
> -     tmp = cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
> -                   RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS);
> -     return tmp == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
> +     return cmpxchg(&sem->count, RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE,
> +             RWSEM_ACTIVE_WRITE_BIAS) == RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
> index 19c5fa9..2072af5 100644
> --- a/lib/rwsem.c
> +++ b/lib/rwsem.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum 
> rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
>                        * will block as they will notice the queued writer.
>                        */
>                       wake_up_process(waiter->task);
> -             goto out;
> +             return sem;
>       }
>  
>       /* Writers might steal the lock before we grant it to the next reader.
> @@ -85,15 +85,21 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum 
> rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
>       adjustment = 0;
>       if (wake_type != RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED) {
>               adjustment = RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS;
> - try_reader_grant:
> -             oldcount = rwsem_atomic_update(adjustment, sem) - adjustment;
> -             if (unlikely(oldcount < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) {
> -                     /* A writer stole the lock. Undo our reader grant. */
> +             while (1) {
> +                     /* A writer stole the lock. */
> +                     if (sem->count < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
> +                             return sem;
> +
> +                     oldcount = rwsem_atomic_update(adjustment, sem)
> +                                                             - adjustment;
> +                     if (likely(oldcount >= RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS))
> +                             break;
> +
> +                      /* A writer stole the lock.  Undo our reader grant. */
>                       if (rwsem_atomic_update(-adjustment, sem) &
>                                               RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
> -                             goto out;
> +                             return sem;
>                       /* Last active locker left. Retry waking readers. */
> -                     goto try_reader_grant;
>               }
>       }
>  
> @@ -136,7 +142,6 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, enum 
> rwsem_wake_type wake_type)
>       sem->wait_list.next = next;
>       next->prev = &sem->wait_list;
>  
> - out:
>       return sem;
>  }
>  
> 


-- 
Thanks
    Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to