On 25/06/13 11:58, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Mark Brown <broo...@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 01:57:56PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>>> This seems fairly complete, but I cannot have such a basic dependency onto
>>> the regmap tree this late in the merge window, i.e. I'm not ready to pull
>>> all of regmap into the pinctrl tree. I'd consider this for merging
>>> for the next kernel cycle so it's more orthogonal.
>>
>> I've got the patch on a topic branch in regmap to allow for this sort of
>> stuff - I can readily provide a signed tag for you to get just that
>> patch if that'd help?  Alternatively I'm happy to carry the pinctrl
>> patch in regmap?
> 
> I'm OK that you carry this in the regmap tree.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Thanks Linus W.

> 
> The clock retime weirdness convinced me that this cannot really
> use the generic pin config layout...
> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kernel mailing list
> ker...@stlinux.com
> http://www.stlinux.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to