On 19 June 2013 22:42, Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> wrote: > The struct cpufreq_driver has been extended to embrace the information > related to boost support. > > When "boost_mode" device tree attribute is defined for a platform, the > boost_supported flag is set. Moreover boost related attributes were > exported. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <[email protected]> > > Changes for v4: > - None > > Changes for v3: > - Remove low level boost code > - Move boost management code to cpufreq core code > - Use boost_supported flag to indicate if driver supports over clocking > > Changes for v2: > - Removal of struct cpufreq_boost > - Removal of the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST flag > - low_level_boost with valid address when boost is supported > --- > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Yes, this looks fine.. I will Ack the whole series in the end, so no individual acks :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
